tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5406891653120763034.post1324418442039445758..comments2024-01-02T15:31:59.152+01:00Comments on The Mathematics Blog by Nilo de Roock: 0.x = 0 is not an axiomnilo de roockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15332190734914631351noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5406891653120763034.post-7101826035624570352008-07-08T03:04:00.000+02:002008-07-08T03:04:00.000+02:00Or: (0 + 0)a = 0a; so 0a + 0a = 0a, hence 0a = 0.Or: (0 + 0)a = 0a; so 0a + 0a = 0a, hence 0a = 0.noonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01025956010458167494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5406891653120763034.post-45825756604058916822008-06-04T14:53:00.000+02:002008-06-04T14:53:00.000+02:00I've forgotten what the correct word is for this t...I've forgotten what the correct word is for this type of nit-picking.<BR/>You should have had A3 in the last statement:)<BR/><BR/>RayRay Rogershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08740233521348558495noreply@blogger.com