As of May 4 2007 the scripts will autodetect your timezone settings. Nothing here has to be changed, but there are a few things

Please follow this blog

Search this blog

Showing posts with label Set Theory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Set Theory. Show all posts

Thursday, February 2, 2012

The integers and the natural numbers have the same cardinality

One could argue that there are twice as many integers as there are natural numbers since for every natural number there are two integers: $1 \mapsto (1,-1)$, $2 \mapsto (2,-2)$.

You can imagine that there was quite some opposition from within the mathematics community when Georg Cantor (1845-1918) proposed the following theorem:
Two sets A and B have the same cardinality if there exists a bijection, that is, an injective and surjective function, from A to B.

A sequence for $\mathbf{N}$ is $$s(n) = \sum_{k=1}^n 1 \ ,$$
$$ \begin{array}{cc}
n & s(n) \\
1 & 1 \\
2 & 2 \\
3 & 3 \\
4 & 4 \\
\cdots & \cdots \end{array} $$

Likewise a sequence for $\mathbf{Z}$ is: $$s(n) = \sum_{k=1}^n (-1)^{k+1} \cdot k \ ,$$
$$ \begin{array}{cc}
n & s(n) \\
1 & 1 \\
2 & -1 \\
3 & 2 \\
4 & -2 \\
\cdots & \cdots \end{array} \, $$ We can thus establish a bijective (one-to-one) map between $\mathbf{N}$ and $\mathbf{Z}$.

By the theorem above we can conclude that $\mathbf{N}$ and $\mathbf{Z}$ have the same cardinality ( 'number of elements' ).

Friday, December 3, 2010

Video Lectures on Number Theory

Among lectures on Calculus I,II and III, ( Introduction to ) Linear Algebra and ( Introduction to ) Differential Equations from the UCCS ( University of Colorado and Colorado Springs ) Department of Mathematics you will find video lectures on Math 311 Number Theory by Professor Dr. Seung Son here. I have watched most of them earlier this year. This week I watched some of them again.

While watching a video on mathematical induction something amazing happened, not sure if I would call it a cognition, but it's close. Since I was able to do proofs by mathematical induction and thus understood it, I thought I was done studying mathematical induction. ( I mean both the MS221 and M208 exams included questions on induction). Well, I close-to-cognited that I didn't understand proofs by mathematical induction -at all-.

Do you? If so:
- state the first principle ( of mathematical induction ) using symbols only,
- state the second principle using symbols only,
- re-formulate: "Show that: ... $$\sum_{k=1}^{n}k = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$$ ..." using Set Terminology,
- can you explain the difference between the first and second principle?
- give an example of a proof using the first principle,
- give an example of a statement which can only be proved with the second principle.

I failed ( note: past tense ) all answers to the questions above. Post is To Be Continued ...

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Saturday, February 9, 2008

Venn diagram

Great Britain, The United Kingdom, or is it England: confused? Charlie Eppes ( Numb3rs ) would probably give a mini-lecture on Set Theory before drawing a Venn diagram to explain the difference. We all use math every day.

Popular Posts

Welcome to The Bridge

Mathematics: is it the fabric of MEST?
This is my voyage
My continuous mission
To uncover hidden structures
To create new theorems and proofs
To boldly go where no man has gone before




(Raumpatrouille – Die phantastischen Abenteuer des Raumschiffes Orion, colloquially aka Raumpatrouille Orion was the first German science fiction television series. Its seven episodes were broadcast by ARD beginning September 17, 1966. The series has since acquired cult status in Germany. Broadcast six years before Star Trek first aired in West Germany (in 1972), it became a huge success.)