#disney# #donaldduck#
Although I am a math geek and a great fan of Donald Duck I had never seen the movie Donald Duck in Mathmagic land.
I knew vaguely of its existence but somehow I never went out to get it. I think I have seen all other movies with a strong link to mathematics though. See my other posts about that. Sol Lederman's Wild About Math blog had a link to it on YouTube. Here it is.
Enjoy the movie!
Please follow this blog
Search this blog
Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Thursday, November 24, 2011
Alan Turing Documentary / Drama
Alan Turing is among the mathematicians who are truly an inspiration to me and I am sure to many, many others. Find the latest documentary on Alan Turing here: Turing Documentary . A review follows soon, when I watched the movie.
Enjoy!
If you don't have access to Channel 4 ( like me ), then download ( and seed! ) the torrent.
Enjoy!
If you don't have access to Channel 4 ( like me ), then download ( and seed! ) the torrent.
Saturday, November 12, 2011
Fabric of the Cosmos
I think I finally 'get it'. That space-time is not just a word, but a fabric. The fabric of the cosmos.
PBS did it again. They created a documentary you'll still be talking about in ten years time. If that sounds strange, think of the documentaries of Jacob Bronowski, Carl Sagan and Marcus du Sautoy.
Anyway, fabric of the cosmos is running now on PBS. Don't miss it.
PBS did it again. They created a documentary you'll still be talking about in ten years time. If that sounds strange, think of the documentaries of Jacob Bronowski, Carl Sagan and Marcus du Sautoy.
Anyway, fabric of the cosmos is running now on PBS. Don't miss it.
"The Fabric of the Cosmos," a four-hour series based on the book by renowned physicist and author Brian Greene, takes us to the frontiers of physics to see how scientists are piecing together the most complete picture yet of space, time, and the universe. With each step, audiences will discover that just beneath the surface of our everyday experience lies a world we’d hardly recognize—a startling world far stranger and more wondrous than anyone expected.
Thursday, August 4, 2011
The Code - Episode 2 - with Marcus du Sautoy
The Code part 2 is about shapes.
Descartes ( rediscovered by Euler ) stated that for any polyhedron the following identy holds $$F-E+V=2.$$ Where $F$ is the number of faces, $E$ is the number of edges and $V$ is the number of vertices. A tetrahedron, for example has $4$ vertices, $4$ faces and $6$ edges: $4 - 6 + 4 = 2$. One of the most beautiful and fascinating mathematical theorems I know states that this formula implies that there are only five regular polyhedra. A theorem that doesn't involve any deep topology or geometry, given $F-E+V=2$ all it takes is some number theory, i.e. solving some Diophantine equations and modular congruences.
Du Sautoy demonstrates the 2D version of the formula above in this episode. He shows that in 2D there can only be three regular lattices created from a regular polyhedron. He visits a beehive and shows how bees create lattices based on perfect pentagons. He then calculates the amount of required wax for the three possibilities and concludes that the pentagon is the best solution. "Nature is lazy", he says and is obviously part of The Code. The fascinating fact here is that nature, in the form of the bee, "knows" this, and for thousands of years. The knowledge about the pentagon and the skill to create pentagons seems encoded in the bee lifeform. Then, what is nature? And what exactly is the role of mathematics? That seem to be the questions he is trying to answer.
From there on Du Sautoy shows us more regular polyhedra in nature. Like a virus in the shape of an icosahedron.
He visits a salt mine with perfectly cube shaped crystals and using a model of the molecule explains the creation of the cube.
If you look closer to the shapes however the creations are not mathematically perfect. Are we using mathematics merely to understand nature? Or is nature driven by mathematics? Fractals are introduced to explain tree like shapes. But although close mathematically perfect fractal-type-of trees don't exist either.
Next week episode 3.
Descartes ( rediscovered by Euler ) stated that for any polyhedron the following identy holds $$F-E+V=2.$$ Where $F$ is the number of faces, $E$ is the number of edges and $V$ is the number of vertices. A tetrahedron, for example has $4$ vertices, $4$ faces and $6$ edges: $4 - 6 + 4 = 2$. One of the most beautiful and fascinating mathematical theorems I know states that this formula implies that there are only five regular polyhedra. A theorem that doesn't involve any deep topology or geometry, given $F-E+V=2$ all it takes is some number theory, i.e. solving some Diophantine equations and modular congruences.
Du Sautoy demonstrates the 2D version of the formula above in this episode. He shows that in 2D there can only be three regular lattices created from a regular polyhedron. He visits a beehive and shows how bees create lattices based on perfect pentagons. He then calculates the amount of required wax for the three possibilities and concludes that the pentagon is the best solution. "Nature is lazy", he says and is obviously part of The Code. The fascinating fact here is that nature, in the form of the bee, "knows" this, and for thousands of years. The knowledge about the pentagon and the skill to create pentagons seems encoded in the bee lifeform. Then, what is nature? And what exactly is the role of mathematics? That seem to be the questions he is trying to answer.
From there on Du Sautoy shows us more regular polyhedra in nature. Like a virus in the shape of an icosahedron.
He visits a salt mine with perfectly cube shaped crystals and using a model of the molecule explains the creation of the cube.
If you look closer to the shapes however the creations are not mathematically perfect. Are we using mathematics merely to understand nature? Or is nature driven by mathematics? Fractals are introduced to explain tree like shapes. But although close mathematically perfect fractal-type-of trees don't exist either.
Next week episode 3.
Saturday, July 30, 2011
Pluperfect Digital Invariants
A Pluperfect Digital Invariants or PPDI aka Armstrong Number is a number which is equal to the sum of a power of its digits.
For example:
$153 = 1^3 + 5^3 + 3^3$.
$1634 = 1^4 + 6^4 + 3^4 + 4^4$.
$54748 = 5^5 + 4^5 + 7^5 + 4^5 + 8^5$
The largest ( known? ) PPDI is $$115 132 219 018 763 992 565 095 597 973 971 522 401$$ which is equal to the sum of the 39th power of its digits.
These facts belong to the realm of mathematics, of course. But we get rather close to what I call anti-mathematics: numerology.
For example:
$153 = 1^3 + 5^3 + 3^3$.
$1634 = 1^4 + 6^4 + 3^4 + 4^4$.
$54748 = 5^5 + 4^5 + 7^5 + 4^5 + 8^5$
The largest ( known? ) PPDI is $$115 132 219 018 763 992 565 095 597 973 971 522 401$$ which is equal to the sum of the 39th power of its digits.
These facts belong to the realm of mathematics, of course. But we get rather close to what I call anti-mathematics: numerology.
As soon as you discard scientific rigor, you're no longer a mathematician, you're a numerologist.
Sol Robeson in Pi
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Marcus du Sautoy in the footsteps of Max Cohen
The Code, part 1 of the new BBC / Open University mathematics documentary presented by Marcus Du Sautoy is in one word excellent. Du Sautoy is on a journey, looking for the code which governs all the patterns we see in the world around us. - Pi ( The Movie ) revisited! The documentary begins almost exactly as the scene in Pi where Max Cohen leaves his flat and meets Jenna, a young girl living in the same building who likes number games. She asks 'How much is 73 divided by 22? ): Max answers with three point three, one eight, one eight, one eight, one eight, one eight, one eight, one eight, etc. until Jenna can no longer hear him. - Once Max enters the street we hear him think:
What Marcus du Sautoy does in Code is collecting evidence, much more evidence for the rules of Max.

Max was searching for a code too, I hope the ending of the series of The Code will be more uptone than Pi. We shall see, two more episodes to view. - Click on the image above to watch it if you qualify, or download a torrent from your favorite site.
1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented through numbers. 3. If you graph the numbers of any system patterns emerge. 4. Therefore there are patterns everywhere in nature. Evidence. The cycles in disease epidemics, sun spot cycles, etc.
What Marcus du Sautoy does in Code is collecting evidence, much more evidence for the rules of Max.

Max was searching for a code too, I hope the ending of the series of The Code will be more uptone than Pi. We shall see, two more episodes to view. - Click on the image above to watch it if you qualify, or download a torrent from your favorite site.
Saturday, June 26, 2010
Cube
Is Cube (2000) a film about mathematics? Not like Pi. ( one of my favourite movies ). Cube is however based on mathematical ideas. People travel around in a 26x26x26 Rubik cube. Some rooms are safe, other rooms viciously kill upon entry. Safety depends upon the coordinates of the room being prime or not. Despite all that Cube is not about mathematics but about psychology and group dynamics. When seven strangers meet in the cube and one says "I'm a cop", the others immediately accept his authority and leadership. The person with the most impressive mathematical capabilities has some sort of mental disability, autism I guess. Well, some mathematicians simply are near autistic. Some merely act as if they were autistic. It is a great way to escape social pressure. While the autists are quiet the manics are rather noisy because they have to carry their colossal genius brains ( read: Ego ) around. Let's face it mathematicians are odd folk. I don't blame the director of Cube for showing that. ( OU trained mathematicians are entirely social and likeable of course! ) Considering the massive scale of conspiracy thinking since 9/11 I liked it when one of the developers of the Cube said: "There is no conspiracy. There is no control. It just happened." A thought I often have myself since the BP oil spill. What if governments only pretend to be in control? - Two more Cube movies were made. HyperCube (2002) and Cube Zero (2004). HyperCube is about a new 4D model of the Cube. Cube Zero goes back in time, it explains what happened before Cube 1. The main character of Cube 0 is the autistic mathematician of Cube 1. In this movie the purpose of the Cube is explained.
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Fermat's Room ( L'habitació de Fermat )
"Four mathematicians who do not know each other are invited by a mysterious host on the pretext of resolving a great enigma...." That's how Fermat's room starts, with a simple invitation. Agatha Christie like but very original nevertheless. A mathematical thriller indeed, but a thriller and a good one. It/s one of those movies that occupies you completely.
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Oxford numbers ( math mystery movie )
Definitely NOT a family Christmas movie: too much sex and nudity. Don't know who wrote the script, probably written by a dreamer, a wannabee of some kind. Young Ph.D. student from Arizona moves to Cambridge as an overseas student. He managed to get a room at the house of one of the people ( an older woman living together with her young attractive cello playing daughter, hint. ) who together with Alan Turing (-himself-) cracked the enigma. In the first scene he walks into the room. And says "that's an enigma", "No, merely a copy, the real one is at the museum", she says. More math stuff. The story plays in 1993 when a certain Wilkins announces that he cracked the 300-year old Bormat Theorem. It turned out that Wilkins stole the idea from a student. ( Maybe the entire reason for the movie was to leak the fact that Andrew Wiles stole the idea for cracking Fermat's theorem from a Ph.D. student. It wouldn't be the first time. Highly speculative of course. ) Anyway, all the girls the Ph.D. student meet fall instaneously for his charmes and seduce him. How surreal. Nerds and math students are instant turn-offs for women, like nude men wearing white socks, sort-of. The Oxford Murders is a paradox in many ways. It's a murder mystery. It's custom not to give away the murderer so I won't. The paradox is that it's a very bad movie, but still so much better than a Beautiful Mind ( except for Jennifer Connolly of course ) which was an award winning movie. There is -some- math in the movie. Fibonacci sequence, just as in PI, which is still the best math movie by far, if you ask me.
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Mathematics in Movies ( 2 )
June, 2008 I wrote about mathematics in movies. As a comment on that post I received a link to this page with movies that are somehow linked to mathematics.
I got two math movies today. Fermat's Room and the Oxford Numbers. Both from 2008, maybe that explains why neither are on the page I mentioned. Haven't seen them yet though. Something for Christmas, perhaps.
I am not sure, but I think a movie about Ramanujan will be released in 2010. A must see. Ramanujan and Hardy in Cambridge. - Haven't watched Numb3rs in a while. I saved two seasons, for 'someday'. Well, maybe that day should be soon. Although Charlie is completely surreal, I mean he is an expert in -every- subject and has time to lecture, write books and be a full-time consultant to the FBI as well. Secret: I adopted one of his habits: I often use a noise-reduction headphone just to create silence around me, not to listen to music. It's great, you should try it while studying.
I got two math movies today. Fermat's Room and the Oxford Numbers. Both from 2008, maybe that explains why neither are on the page I mentioned. Haven't seen them yet though. Something for Christmas, perhaps.
I am not sure, but I think a movie about Ramanujan will be released in 2010. A must see. Ramanujan and Hardy in Cambridge. - Haven't watched Numb3rs in a while. I saved two seasons, for 'someday'. Well, maybe that day should be soon. Although Charlie is completely surreal, I mean he is an expert in -every- subject and has time to lecture, write books and be a full-time consultant to the FBI as well. Secret: I adopted one of his habits: I often use a noise-reduction headphone just to create silence around me, not to listen to music. It's great, you should try it while studying.
Monday, April 13, 2009
Mad mathematicians
It is a beautiful Easter. What does this mean? Close to a million tourists in our already overpopulated small country. It's not that I don't welcome tourists, on the contrary. But I don't want to meet them today. I have been out early this morning, getting drinks and other groceries and the roads were already crowded. Almost as busy as on an ordinary working day. I want to do something different today though. It is Easter for me too. So I have been searching for documentaries on math. ( I can't give you exact links because Google might ban my Blogger account but seek and you will find. ) Yesterday I found the documentary about the Black Scholes option pricing formula. Today I found the following documentary.
The life of Turing was both fascinating and dramatic. Turing foresaw the profession of computer programmer long before computers were invented. He also won WW2 practically by himself by cracking the Enigma code. This super-hero status was not enough to forgive him the fact that he was homosexual. Instead he got convicted because he was a practising homosexual. He didn't have to go to jail if he took a libido eliminating injection every month. I can imagine that such an intelligent person couldn't live with so much brutality. He died of eating a poisoned apple. He wanted to spare his mother the misery of having a son who killed himself.
In this one-off documentary, David Malone looks at four brilliant mathematicians - Georg Cantor, Ludwig Boltzmann, Kurt G?del and Alan Turing - whose genius has profoundly affected us, but which tragically drove them insane and eventually led to them all committing suicide.
The film also talks to the latest in the line of thinkers who have continued to pursue the question of whether there are things that mathematics and the human mind cannot know. They include Greg Chaitin, mathematician at the IBM TJ Watson Research Center, New York, and Roger Penrose.
Dangerous Knowledge tackles some of the profound questions about the true nature of reality that mathematical thinkers are still trying to answer today.
Part 1: God’s messenger
The film begins with Georg Cantor, the great mathematician whose work proved to be the foundation for much of the 20th-century mathematics. He believed he was God’s messenger and was eventually driven insane trying to prove his theories of infinity.
Ludwig Boltzmann’s struggle to prove the existence of atoms and probability eventually drove him to suicide.
Part 2: The Enigma
Kurt Gödel, the introverted confidant of Einstein, proved that there would always be problems which were outside human logic. His life ended in a sanatorium where he starved himself to death.
Finally, Alan Turing, the great Bletchley Park code breaker, father of computer science and homosexual, died trying to prove that some things are fundamentally unprovable.
The life of Turing was both fascinating and dramatic. Turing foresaw the profession of computer programmer long before computers were invented. He also won WW2 practically by himself by cracking the Enigma code. This super-hero status was not enough to forgive him the fact that he was homosexual. Instead he got convicted because he was a practising homosexual. He didn't have to go to jail if he took a libido eliminating injection every month. I can imagine that such an intelligent person couldn't live with so much brutality. He died of eating a poisoned apple. He wanted to spare his mother the misery of having a son who killed himself.
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Mathematics and the economic crisis
As far as I can understand the current economic problems have their root cause in derivatives like Credit Default Swaps. And that is all math. There is a BBC program about a company which failed in the nineties but the story seems relevant even today. The founders of LCTM thought to have found a math formula with which you could always win at the stock market.
This is the extraordinary story of a beautiful mathematical formula that changed the world, the financial markets, and indeed capitalism itself. It could do the unthinkable - it took the risk out of playing the money-markets. To its inventors it brought the Nobel Prize for economics. To those who used it, it brought great wealth. But this glittering tale would end in tragedy.
The Black Scholes formula was invented 25 years ago, by three young mathematicians. They had been trying to solve a problem that had plagued economists for centuries - how to counter the randomness of market forces and the irrationality of human behaviour that made the markets dangerously turbulent. Whilst pondering this dilemma, they made a remarkable discovery.
The search for a way to price option contracts began in earnest when the thesis of an unknown student named Louis Bachelier was unearthed in the 1950s. Working at the beginning of this century, Bachelier had set out to do something no-one had ever done before - using a series of equations he created the first complete mathematical model of the markets. He had realised that stock prices moved at random and that it was impossible to make exact predictions about them, but Bachelier said he had also found a solution - through the pricing of a financial contract called an option.
The risk in the stock market is that if you buy a stock today the price can drop in the future and you could lose money but if you pay for an option contract this gives you the right to wait and buy the stock if it reaches some agreed price in the future, but there’s no obligation. If the stock fails to reach that price you can opt out and you would lose only the cost of the option. In theory options are a perfect way to get rid of risk, but there was a problem. How much would someone pay for such absolute peace of mind?
Bachelier believed that if someone could discover a formula that would allow option contracts to be widely used, they would be able to tame the markets completely, but he died before he could find it. By the end of the 60s, academics were no nearer to pricing options than they’d ever been. But all this was about to change when Myron Scholes and his colleague Fischer Black set out to tackle the problem of options…
At its simplest level, the Black Scholes formula could be used to hedge against losing any bet, by working out how to place another bet in the opposite direction. That way, you couldn’t lose. The formula had the almost magical ability to allow you to make a fortune with the minimum of risk. But there was one problem. In the time it took to make the calculation, the fast moving markets had moved on and the calculation would effectively be out-of-date.
However, unbeknown to them, the problem had already been solved by a financial genius called Bob Merton. Using an idea taken from rocket science, the value of an option could now be constantly recalculated and the risk eliminated continually.
Myron Scholes and Bob Merton joined forces with the greatest dealers on Wall Street, and started a legendary company - Long Term Capital Management (LTCM). Relying on mathematics, the company traded and borrowed on a scale never seen before. But the mathematical model was based on normal market behaviour and unforeseen events were about to send the markets wild. The calculations in LTCM’s models became hopelessly out of kilter, and when the company collapsed last year, it nearly brought down the entire global economy.
Sunday, June 22, 2008
Mathematics in the Movies
Not counting Numb3rs there aren't many movies truly about math. As far as I know anyway. I know of the following movies ( in alphabetical order ):
- A Beautiful Mind
- Flatland
- PI
- Proof.
All these movies are fairly recent. The oldest is PI, from 1998. So that's encouraging. There is a movie about Ramanujan / Hardy in the works. Looking forward to that one.
- A Beautiful Mind
- Flatland
- PI
- Proof.
All these movies are fairly recent. The oldest is PI, from 1998. So that's encouraging. There is a movie about Ramanujan / Hardy in the works. Looking forward to that one.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Among lectures on Calculus I,II and III, ( Introduction to ) Linear Algebra and ( Introduction to ) Differential Equations from the UCCS ( ...
-
Problem: We want to calculate the sum of the elements of a list of numbers. Suppose this list is named l and has been assigned the value {1,...
-
Today I started to read the Ramanujan biography ( The e-book version, of course. ) The book looks promising. What was it like to communicate...
-
I found a set of video lectures on Abstract Algebra. MATH E-222 Abstract Algebra - http://www.extension.harvard.edu/openlearning/math222/ E...
-
Ramanujan's genius (r) was discovered by Hardy (l) At a very young age Ramanujan designed the following formula for a 3 by 3 magic sq...
Welcome to The Bridge
Mathematics: is it the fabric of MEST?
This is my voyage
My continuous mission
To uncover hidden structures
To create new theorems and proofs
To boldly go where no man has gone before
(Raumpatrouille – Die phantastischen Abenteuer des Raumschiffes Orion, colloquially aka Raumpatrouille Orion was the first German science fiction television series. Its seven episodes were broadcast by ARD beginning September 17, 1966. The series has since acquired cult status in Germany. Broadcast six years before Star Trek first aired in West Germany (in 1972), it became a huge success.)








